Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video630 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Nutrition Programs results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 40.2% saturation with 1,013 hits. Analysis detected 5,020 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,520 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of ā 82% (3,090 of 16,562 topics). This Child Nutrition Programs is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group.
Child Nutrition Programs
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 82%Child Nutrition Programs (selected)6%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,520
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510081.3% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 40.2%40.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Politically Right Leaningā€¦Sitewide 1.4%Topic 14.8%14.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 25.2%25.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 11.2%11.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 40.2%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos