Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video814 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Nutrition Program Fraud results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 575 hits. Analysis detected 3,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,256 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (6,077 of 16,562 topics). This Child Nutrition Program Fraud is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Child Nutrition Program Fraud
Topic details
Total words: 3,256
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.3% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.3%10.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 4.8%4.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos