Topic summary
⁠56%4 analyzed articles/videos4,570 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Nutrition results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 1,589 hits. Analysis detected 12,059 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,308 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (14,641 of 16,562 topics). This Child Nutrition is better (less manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group.
Child Nutrition
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 16,308
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

12% percentile
025507510011.6% percentile
1.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles16.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos