Topic summary
64%2 analyzed articles/videos753 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Endangerment results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.5% saturation with 689 hits. Analysis detected 3,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,259 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 84% (2,757 of 16,562 topics). This Child Endangerment is worse (more manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group.
Child Endangerment
Topic details
Total words: 2,259
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510083.4% percentile
6.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 30.5%30.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.3%16.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.9%7.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 30.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate