Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos662 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Death results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 376 hits. Analysis detected 1,778 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,648 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,421 of 16,190 topics). This Child Death is worse (more manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group.
Child Death
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,648
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510054.2% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.2%14.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos