Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Chicago Art Scene results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 685 hits. Analysis detected 3,798 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,783 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Chicago Art Scene is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Chicago Art Scene
Topic details
Total words: 3,783
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.2%10.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.1%18.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.5%9.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.4%13.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos