Topic summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video554 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chemical Regulation results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 396 hits. Analysis detected 3,320 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,662 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,411 of 16,562 topics). This Chemical Regulation is worse (more manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group.
Chemical Regulation
Topic details
Total words: 1,662
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510085.4% percentile
6.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 15.8%15.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 13.6%13.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.6%16.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 18.8%18.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.3%11.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.8%6.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 19.9%19.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 23.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos