Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video870 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chelsea Handler results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Bandwagon, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 338 hits. Analysis detected 2,771 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,610 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (8,047 of 16,559 topics). This Chelsea Handler is worse (more manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group.
Chelsea Handler
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,610
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.4% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 12.9%12.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.6%12.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos