Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 355 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chatgpt Images results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 60.8% saturation with 648 hits . Analysis detected 2,769 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,065 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.3% and a BS Rank of 97% (509 of 16,562 topics). This Chatgpt Images is worse (more manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group. Chatgpt Images
Topic details
Total words: 1,065
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
97% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.9% percentile 15.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 60.9% 60.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 45.0% 45.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 35.0% 35.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 13.3% 13.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 28.4% 28.4% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 9.7% 9.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 13.0% 13.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Topic 60.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 45.0%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 35.0%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Topic 28.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 6.7% Recency Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Composition/Division: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst