Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video355 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chatgpt Images results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 60.8% saturation with 648 hits. Analysis detected 2,769 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,065 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.3% and a BS Rank of 97% (509 of 16,562 topics). This Chatgpt Images is worse (more manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group.
Chatgpt Images
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,065
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

97% percentile
025507510096.9% percentile
15.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 60.9%60.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 45.0%45.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 35.0%35.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 13.3%13.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 28.4%28.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 11.5%11.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 9.7%9.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 8.3%8.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.0%13.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 60.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 45.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 35.0%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 28.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.1%Composition/Division: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos