Topic summary
⁠10%1 analyzed article/video1,013 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charter Amendments results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.1% saturation with 125 hits. Analysis detected 1,050 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,052 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (23,477 of 24,545 topics). This Charter Amendments is better (less manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group.
Charter Amendments
Topic details
Total words: 4,052
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

4% percentile
02550751004.4% percentile
1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.6%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos