Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video771 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charlie Kirk Case results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, False Dilemma, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 144 hits. Analysis detected 1,023 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,084 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (15,514 of 16,562 topics). This Charlie Kirk Case is better (less manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group.
Charlie Kirk Case
Topic details
Total words: 3,084
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

6% percentile
02550751006.3% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.6%1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos