Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,525 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Character Virtue results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Indoctrination, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 930 hits. Analysis detected 5,409 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (15,488 of 16,562 topics). This Character Virtue is better (less manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group.
Character Virtue
Topic details
Total words: 10,100
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

7% percentile
02550751006.5% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos