Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Chaplaincy results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Burden of Proof, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 274 hits. Analysis detected 1,065 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Chaplaincy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Chaplaincy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,132
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 6.4%6.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.9%11.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.0%5.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 24.2%24.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 24.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos