Topic summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Centrist Politics results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Tu Quoque , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 56.7% saturation with 1,710 hits . Analysis detected 5,396 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 15,771 topics). This Centrist Politics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Centrist Politics
Topic details
Total words: 3,016
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0â75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 56.7% 56.7% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.6% 15.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 18.6% 18.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Politically Left Leaning ⌠Sitewide 2.0% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 56.7%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Tu Quoque: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 0.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Horn Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.0% Indoctrination: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst