Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos163 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celebrity Politics results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 448 hits. Analysis detected 3,002 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,317 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (4,960 of 15,769 topics). This Celebrity Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group.
Celebrity Politics
Topic details
Total words: 2,317
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510068.6% percentile
4.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 19.3%19.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.5%14.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 9.5%9.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Horn Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.0%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos