Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video580 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Celebrity Incidents results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39.8% saturation with 923 hits. Analysis detected 2,826 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,320 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (2,730 of 16,558 topics). This Celebrity Incidents is worse (more manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group.
Celebrity Incidents
Topic details
Total words: 2,320
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510083.5% percentile
6.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 33.6%33.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 39.8%39.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.6%6.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 39.8%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 33.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.0%Special Pleading: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos