Topic summary
⁠71%2 analyzed articles/videos605 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cecilia Vega results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 431 hits. Analysis detected 3,116 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,463 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,472 of 16,562 topics). This Cecilia Vega is worse (more manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
Cecilia Vega
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠55%Cecilia Vega (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,463
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.9% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 9.1%9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.3%5.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.0%Horn Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos