Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video956 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caregivers results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Optimism Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.6% saturation with 735 hits. Analysis detected 2,628 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,868 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,422 of 15,988 topics). This Caregivers is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Caregivers
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,868
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.3% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 25.6%25.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 7.5%7.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 2.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos