Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos3,426 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Careers results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 1,071 hits. Analysis detected 10,232 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,683 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,973 of 16,562 topics). This Careers is better (less manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Careers
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 11,683
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.7% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.2%9.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate