Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video488 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Career Scandal results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 346 hits. Analysis detected 2,959 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,952 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (4,132 of 16,562 topics). This Career Scandal is worse (more manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group.
Career Scandal
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,952
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510075.1% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 14.8%14.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 12.6%12.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.7%17.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 9.1%9.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 8.7%8.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.0%11.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 5.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 2.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos