Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video632 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cara Delevingne results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hindsight Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 149 hits. Analysis detected 913 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,528 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (13,770 of 16,562 topics). This Cara Delevingne is better (less manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group.
Cara Delevingne
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,528
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510016.9% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos