Topic summary
64%2 analyzed articles/videos387 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Car Features results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 586 hits. Analysis detected 3,980 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,041 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 67% (5,540 of 16,562 topics). This Car Features is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Car Features
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,041
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510066.6% percentile
4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 19.3%19.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.2%17.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.3%12.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos