Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 580 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Car Accidents results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39.8% saturation with 923 hits . Analysis detected 2,826 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,320 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 84% (2,729 of 16,562 topics). This Car Accidents is worse (more manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group. Car Accidents
Topic details
Total words: 2,320
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.5% percentile 6.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 33.6% 33.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 39.8% 39.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 39.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 33.6%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.0% Special Pleading: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.6% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst