Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Cancer Diagnosis results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 767 hits. Analysis detected 4,126 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,353 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Cancer Diagnosis is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Cancer Diagnosis
Topic details
Total words: 4,353
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.0%5.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos