Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video476 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cancer Care results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 393 hits. Analysis detected 1,967 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,904 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,895 of 16,562 topics). This Cancer Care is worse (more manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Cancer Care
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,904
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.4% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 20.6%20.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 13.9%13.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 9.9%9.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 20.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Middle Ground: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos