Topic summary
83%1 analyzed article/video1,276 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Canadian Law results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 795 hits. Analysis detected 5,387 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,828 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 66% (5,455 of 15,689 topics). This Canadian Law is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Canadian Law
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,828
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.2% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.9%12.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.0%13.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 20.8%20.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.1%10.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 4.7%4.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos