Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,588 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Canadian Authors results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 378 hits. Analysis detected 1,562 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,764 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (14,166 of 16,562 topics). This Canadian Authors is better (less manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group.
Canadian Authors
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,764
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

15% percentile
025507510014.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos