Topic summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video906 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Canada Tariffs results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36.7% saturation with 997 hits. Analysis detected 3,820 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,718 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (4,170 of 16,562 topics). This Canada Tariffs is worse (more manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group.
Canada Tariffs
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,718
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510074.8% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 36.7%36.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 11.5%11.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.9%13.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.9%4.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.6%5.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 36.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos