Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Canada Soccer results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 913 hits. Analysis detected 5,803 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,240 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,559 topics). This Canada Soccer is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Canada Soccer
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,240
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 15.9%15.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.5%14.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos