Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Camping Hiking results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 136 hits. Analysis detected 862 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,000 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,657 topics). This Camping Hiking is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Camping Hiking
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,000
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos