Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 511 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Campaign Funding results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 257 hits . Analysis detected 1,563 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,044 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 65% (5,854 of 16,562 topics). This Campaign Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group. Campaign Funding
Topic details
Total words: 2,044
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.7% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst