Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,534 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Campaign Finance Transparency results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 1,274 hits. Analysis detected 9,018 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,136 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (12,331 of 16,562 topics). This Campaign Finance Transparency is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.
Campaign Finance Transparency
Topic details
Total words: 10,136
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510025.5% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.5%11.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 9.3%9.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.6%12.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos