Topic summary
10%2 analyzed articles/videos1,112 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Camden County results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Bandwagon, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 3.2% saturation with 141 hits. Analysis detected 1,210 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,448 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (21,802 of 23,432 topics). This Camden County is better (less manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group.
Camden County
Topic details
Total words: 4,448
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

7% percentile
02550751007.0% percentile
1.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos