Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These California Primary Election results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anchoring Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 293 faulty-reasoning hits from 764 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This California Primary Election is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
California Primary Election
Topic details
Total words: 764
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles764 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.1%2.1%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 5.5%5.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 6.4%6.4%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos