Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,104 analyzed words
BS Summary: These California Parks results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 340 hits. Analysis detected 3,537 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,405 of 16,562 topics). This California Parks is better (less manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group.
California Parks
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,416
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510037.2% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos