Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video477 analyzed words
BS Summary: These California Academy Of Sciences results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 153 hits. Analysis detected 996 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (9,087 of 16,562 topics). This California Academy Of Sciences is better (less manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
California Academy Of Sciences
Topic details
Total words: 1,908
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.1% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.0%8.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos