Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video1,073 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Byu Scheduling results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 32.5% saturation with 1,047 hits. Analysis detected 5,852 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,219 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of ā 83% (2,942 of 16,748 topics). This Byu Scheduling is worse (more manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group.
Byu Scheduling
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,219
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510082.4% percentile
6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 32.5%32.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 16.7%16.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Fundamental Attribution Eā€¦Sitewide 2.7%Topic 10.4%10.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 11.8%11.8%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.8%6.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.1%8.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Topic 32.5%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.1%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Horn Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Tu Quoque: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos