Topic summary
⁠3%1 analyzed article/video458 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Business Settlements results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 280 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,832 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (18,390 of 22,981 topics). This Business Settlements is better (less manipulative) than 80.00% of the peer group.
Business Settlements
Topic details
Total words: 1,832
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

20% percentile
025507510020.0% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos