Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video568 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Business Revival results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 299 hits. Analysis detected 2,363 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,272 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 59% (6,350 of 15,327 topics). This Business Revival is worse (more manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
Business Revival
Topic details
Total words: 2,272
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510058.6% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.0%11.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.2%13.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.0%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos