Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video593 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Business Development results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 416 hits. Analysis detected 2,512 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,372 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,344 of 15,364 topics). This Business Development is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Business Development
Topic details
Total words: 2,372
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.2% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 17.5%17.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.4%9.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos