Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video343 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bus Lane results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 29.1% saturation with 399 hits. Analysis detected 1,891 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,372 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 81% (3,193 of 16,312 topics). This Bus Lane is worse (more manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group.
Bus Lane
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,372
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510080.4% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 29.1%29.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 21.4%21.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 4.7%4.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.5%4.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Topic 29.1%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos