Topic summary
⁠31%2 analyzed articles/videos650 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bureau Of Land Management results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anchoring Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 265 hits. Analysis detected 1,778 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,158 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (5,872 of 15,882 topics). This Bureau Of Land Management is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Bureau Of Land Management
Topic details
Total words: 2,158
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.0% percentile
3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.3%12.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.7%3.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 4.0%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos