Topic summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video1,014 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Building Efficiency results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Overconfidence Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 441 hits. Analysis detected 3,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,056 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,200 of 16,562 topics). This Building Efficiency is better (less manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Building Efficiency
Topic details
Total words: 4,056
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.5% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.9%10.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos