Topic summary
⁠77%2 analyzed articles/videos2,122 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Budget Shortfall results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 676 hits. Analysis detected 6,976 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,988 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (8,381 of 16,494 topics). This Budget Shortfall is better (less manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Budget Shortfall
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,988
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510049.2% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.7%9.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos