Topic summary
86% 2 analyzed articles/videos 666 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Budget Resolution results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 949 hits . Analysis detected 6,733 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,862 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 44% (9,343 of 16,559 topics). This Budget Resolution is better (less manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group. Budget Resolution
Topic details
Total words: 5,862
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.6% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 16.2% 16.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 12.5% 12.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst