Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video3,161 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Budget Eating results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Indoctrination, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 59% saturation with 7,456 hits. Analysis detected 19,214 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,644 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (4,634 of 16,562 topics). This Budget Eating is worse (more manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group.
Budget Eating
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 12,644
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.0% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 59.0%59.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.5%7.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.5%10.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 59.0%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 4.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos