Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Budget Crisis results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 261 hits. Analysis detected 1,228 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,886 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,769 topics). This Budget Crisis is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Budget Crisis
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,886
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.8%13.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos