Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 534 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bryce Harper results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 433 hits . Analysis detected 1,891 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,136 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 48% (8,323 of 15,752 topics). This Bryce Harper is better (less manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group. Bryce Harper
Topic details
Total words: 2,136
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.2% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 20.3% 20.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst