Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video479 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brooklyn Shootings results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 110 hits. Analysis detected 574 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,916 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (11,952 of 16,562 topics). This Brooklyn Shootings is better (less manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
Brooklyn Shootings
Topic details
Total words: 1,916
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510027.8% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.0%2.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos