Topic summary
⁠12%1 analyzed article/video421 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bristol results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 139 hits. Analysis detected 441 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,684 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (12,105 of 23,503 topics). This Bristol is better (less manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group.
Bristol
Topic details
Total words: 1,684
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510048.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.3%8.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 1.1%1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos